Saussure
* its components (sf&sd) are arbitrary and motivate. * has no natural relation. 5. The signifier and signified does not have connection between them. They are arbitrary and conventional. 6. The sign has infinite interpretations, it is a chain that builds making- menaning because one thing leads us to another. 7. ‘Linguistics is only a part of that general science’, semiology. |
PeircePeirce try to connect all social phenomena in one science, semiotics.
He said that the reality can be known through signs. Peirce was a pragmatist that considered the sign as a triad composed by representamen, object and interpretan. He pay attention to the logic and held that there is no only one, there are several of them. The signifier and object (signified) have a relation. Icon, index and, symbol. His method is the abduction and his object the information that the signs leave behind. He argued that the semiotic is part of linguistic. he studied the speech |
SIGNIFIER
SIGNIFIED |
SIGN
OBJECT INTERPRETANT (mind idea) |
BarthesBarthes was a semiologist.
He holds that the signs are a result of the cultural develop, They are not natural. How the people makes meaningful the meaningless things? Language it is a subset of signs. Barthes studied the speech and puts the receiver when stresses that the ultimate meaning of any cultural text is released by the same receiver. His semiotics: study of the signs, its structure, and the relationship between signified and signifier. Main concepts: Value: The sign has value if this is different by other. Syntagm: Sign combination, in linguistics, the speaking chain. Commutation proof: it shows us the meaningful unities of a system. Braid dress, white. Denotation: (establish meaning) relationship between its sign and its referent (relacionado, relative). Conventional, the meaning is literal it does not have double sense. Connotation: (interpreted) relationship between the sign and the other signs, it is the sing capacity of integrates other sign and meanings. Code: (language) set of rules. Emerges signs from them. |
VerónHis theory is the social discourses: meaning analysis as a productive system.
"tejido de la semiosis", a discourse need other discourses, infinite chain. Verón is characterized by the connection between the semiotics and the social phenomenon. He take into account the Saussure’s work from the social production of meaning. Verón show us the importance of the text recognition and the production process. He considered the speech as a place of exchange and contract. He does not pay attention to the Saussure’s linguistic and takes care of the narrative speeches from a logical and structural perspective.
|